Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves
I’m not sure if the movie has satisfied the expectations of D&D fans, but for me this is a welcomed return to the kind of comedy that I thought Hollywood has forgotten how to make.
★★★★★
Mild Spoilers
Directed by Jonathan Goldstein and John Francis Daley
Written by Jonathan Goldstein, John Francis Daley and Michael Gilio
Story by Chris McKay and Michael Gilio
Set in an alternate medieval fantasy world, thief Edgin (Chris Pine) and a ragtag team of wizards, warriors and more must embark on a quest to save the city of Neverwinter from being usurped by the nefarious Red Wizards, and rescue Edgin’s daughter Kira from the clutches of the Lord of Neverwinter (Hugh Grant).
The synopsis above doesn’t really do the film justice, because the movie is a lot more fun than it sounds. It takes its inspiration from movies like The Princess Bride, Monty Python and the Holy Grail, and even Army of Darkness. You can say it’s a silly, low-brow action comedy, a parody even, but with a bit of class and wit. I’m not sure if the movie has satisfied the expectations of D&D fans, but for me this is a welcomed return to the kind of comedy that I thought Hollywood has forgotten how to make. Some of its highlights include the graveyard scene, certain magical spells and artifacts, a guy named Jonathan, and I kid you not, Regé-Jean Page. Yes, the dude from Bridgerton and The Grey Man was FUNNY. There are even unexpected cameos and funny Easter eggs from the game and other reiterations.
But what impressed me more was how it also did the other stuff just as well. Firstly, every one of the main cast of characters are likeable. Each has his or her own story arc, cool skillsets and relatability, and brought to life perfectly by the actors playing them, which includes Pine, Michelle Rodriguez (from the Fast & Furious movies), Justice Smith (Detective Pikachu, Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom), and Sophia Lillis (It: Chapter One and Two). There are even some genuinely touching moments that are testaments to how well-realised these characters are. The action sequences were surprisingly well-choreographed, from the hand-to-hand combat to the magical melees. Hugh Grant was effortlessly great as the awkwardly charming villain.
Honestly, for an obviously commercialized endeavour to promote the Dungeons & Dragons brand, it delivered a lot more than it ever needed to on a creative level. It could have been the Top Gun: Maverick of 2023 because of how similarly well-put-together it was, if only it did just as well box-office wise. Don’t let these detract you from watching the movie, though. If you enjoyed movies like The Princess Bride, you’re going to love this one, I guarantee it.
Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
Overall, it was a bit of a muddle. It doesn’t know whether it wants to be a Strange-Christine romance, a buddy-sorcerer movie with America, or Wandavision 2.
★★★1/2
Medium-level spoilers
Directed by Sam Raimi
Written by Michael Waldron
For those who were complaining about Moon Knight being meandering, fret not, because the MCU theatrical division is back with its 28th outing that is jam-packed with all the razzle dazzle that you’ve been missing from its more contemplative and episodic brethren from Disney+. But is that a good thing? Straight out of the gate, we are plunged into a multiversal action set piece involving new MCU character America Chavez, Doctor Strange and… the monster from Edge of Tomorrow? There is a mysterious and powerful threat at play, so Strange seeks help from incumbent Sorcerer Supreme Wong, and also Wanda Maximoff, who may be the only person powerful enough to stop it.
Overall, it was a bit of a muddle. It doesn’t know whether it wants to be a Strange-Christine romance, a buddy-sorcerer movie with America, or Wandavision 2. With only a two hour runtime, they should have picked one story thread to focus on. As a result, none of the major plot threads have a satisfying enough of a conclusion, especially Wanda’s.
As a Sam Raimi joint, this felt too reined in. I was anticipating cackling demons, Dutch angles and morbid humour sometimes involving his brother Ted, but there were only very rudimentary Evil Dead-ish references that were oddly sapped of his trademark cheesy humour. His Spider-Man films were way more Raimi-esque in comparison. I don’t understand why you’d hire someone like Raimi and then shackle him.
What about the multiverse parts, you say? They did have some good fun with it. Those who have been speculating some things about the movie is going to enjoy what they see. Exciting though the implications may be, but this is the multiverse we’re talking about here. Things can still very much change if you think about it. But I was surprised by how little they did with it. At the end, I was like, is that it? Five movies in and still no signs of Kang, or Mephisto.
Don’t get me wrong, this is still a fairly enjoyable flick. The first Doctor Strange film remains his best outing to date, and I really loved how innovative and clever that one was. I like Multiverse of Madness more than Black Widow and Eternals, but No Way Home and Shang-Chi remain the best of the Phase 4 films.
Originally published on my Facebook Page, here.
Required viewings: Doctor Strange and Wandavision. There are mentions of events from Infinity War, Endgame, and No Way Home, but they aren’t as integral to the main story as the other two.